resources because they provide more beef with fewer cattle. , fewer cattle = less waste, and less use of energy, land and water. the conservation of natural resources that results from feeding zilmax to cattle has been measured. for example, for every head of beef cattle fed zilmax, compared to cattle not...
enjoyed steaks from cattle fed zilmax in the largest grilled steak taste-test study ever. this research showed consumers rated beef from cattle fed the supplement as flavorful, tender and juicy – the same when compared to cattle that were not fed the supplement. as thousands of consumers tasted steak...
of sustainability is keeping beef affordable for a broad range of consumers. it's all about supply and demand. based on recent data, when zilmax was not used, the supply of boneless beef in the u.s. was reduced by about semi-loads per week. that's equivalent to the amount of beef million americans buy...