Search Results for: Figs
detail by immunostaining (fig. a), and the corresponding dysferlin intensity was calculated (fig. b). thus, dysferlin was seen to increase in a dose‐responsive way upon addition of , , and μm nocodazole (fig. b) and was confirmed also in other clones (mm# and mm# , shown in supporting information figs
detail by immunostaining (fig. a), and the corresponding dysferlin intensity was calculated (fig. b). thus, dysferlin was seen to increase in a dose‐responsive way upon addition of , , and μm nocodazole (fig. b) and was confirmed also in other clones (mm# and mm# , shown in supporting information figs...
https://stemcellsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sctm.18-0280
detail by immunostaining (fig. a), and the corresponding dysferlin intensity was calculated (fig. b). thus, dysferlin was seen to increase in a dose‐responsive way upon addition of , , and μm nocodazole (fig. b) and was confirmed also in other clones (mm# and mm# , shown in supporting information figs
detail by immunostaining (fig. a), and the corresponding dysferlin intensity was calculated (fig. b). thus, dysferlin was seen to increase in a dose‐responsive way upon addition of , , and μm nocodazole (fig. b) and was confirmed also in other clones (mm# and mm# , shown in supporting information figs...
https://stemcellsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sctm.18-0280